Trump Suggests Deporting US Citizens in Controversial Statement

law Jul 1, 2025

A controversial video has emerged showing Donald Trump making statements about potentially deporting US citizens, including those born in the country. The remarks, which have sparked intense debate in legal circles, were originally shared by Reddit user u/PrithvinathReddy on the r/law subreddit, where they've generated significant discussion among legal professionals and concerned citizens.

In the video, Trump can be heard saying, "We also have a lot of bad people that have been here for a long time... many of them were born in our country. I think we ought to get them the hell out of here too, if you want to know the truth. So maybe that'll be the next job."

Legal Community Responds with Alarm

The statement has raised immediate constitutional concerns, particularly regarding the 14th Amendment, which guarantees birthright citizenship. Legal experts are questioning how such a policy could be implemented without violating fundamental constitutional protections.

One Reddit user, burnmenowz, captured the sentiment of many legal observers: "Look at that US citizens are next. Exactly as predicted...." This comment, which received nearly 6,000 upvotes, reflects the concern that deportation policies might expand beyond their traditional scope.

Constitutional Implications and Legal Analysis

The suggestion of deporting natural-born citizens presents significant legal challenges. Under current constitutional law, citizenship acquired by birth cannot be revoked involuntarily. Expert_Country7228 highlighted this vulnerability in the discussion: "Anyone can be 'Illegal and deported' with one stroke of the pen. You are not safe because you have a piece of paper. Just saying..."

This comment underscores the fear that citizenship protections, long considered absolute, might face unprecedented challenges. The legal community is particularly concerned about the precedent such policies could set.

What Legal Experts Are Saying

The response from the legal community has been swift and largely critical. Many are pointing out that deporting US citizens would require either:

Constitutional amendments changing birthright citizenship Extraordinary legal interpretations of existing law Potentially unconstitutional executive actions

The discussion has also touched on broader themes of due process and equal protection under the law.

Public Reaction and Political Implications

Beyond the legal implications, the statement has generated significant political backlash. User namastayhom33 expressed the urgency felt by many: "Remove. Him. Now. Like, now...." This sentiment reflects the belief among some that such statements pose an immediate threat to democratic institutions.

The video shows Trump speaking at what appears to be an official event, complete with American flags and presidential seals in the background. A news ticker visible in the footage suggests this was part of a broader press conference or announcement.

Historical Context and Precedent

While the United States has a complex history with deportation and citizenship revocation, targeting natural-born citizens would represent a significant departure from established legal precedent. Previous cases of citizenship revocation have typically involved naturalized citizens and allegations of fraud in the naturalization process.

The current discussion raises questions about how far executive power can extend in matters of citizenship and deportation. Legal scholars are already preparing for potential constitutional challenges should such policies be pursued.

What This Means Moving Forward

For now, these remain statements rather than implemented policies. However, the legal community is taking them seriously as indicators of potential future actions. The discussion on r/law reflects the broader concern among legal professionals about the direction of immigration and citizenship policy.

The viral nature of this discussion – with over 23,000 upvotes and thousands of comments – demonstrates the level of public interest and concern surrounding these issues. It's clear that any actual attempts to implement such policies would face significant legal challenges.

FAQ: Understanding the Legal Implications

Can the US government legally deport natural-born citizens?

Under current constitutional law, natural-born US citizens cannot be involuntarily stripped of their citizenship or deported. This would require significant changes to constitutional interpretation or amendments.

What would it take to change birthright citizenship laws?

Changing birthright citizenship would likely require a constitutional amendment, which needs approval from two-thirds of both houses of Congress and three-fourths of state legislatures.

Have US citizens ever been deported before?

While rare, there have been historical instances of US citizens being wrongfully deported, but these were generally acknowledged as violations of their rights rather than legal policy.

Source Attribution

Source: Originally discussed by u/PrithvinathReddy on r/law

Read the original post: Reddit Thread

Conclusion

This controversy highlights the ongoing tension between executive power and constitutional protections. While these statements have generated significant concern in legal circles, they also serve as a reminder of the importance of constitutional safeguards and the role of legal professionals in defending them.

The discussion continues to evolve as more legal experts weigh in on the implications of such policies. What's clear is that any attempt to implement deportation of US citizens would face unprecedented legal challenges and constitutional scrutiny.